Short for ecological architecture – ecotecture is a term coined by my friend, mentor and infamous firebrand Rudolf Doernach (1929-2016). Doernach was a partner of R. Buckminster Fuller in Germany and a pioneer of the living building movement in Germany in the 1970’s. As a consummate wordsmith and eco-philosopher, Rudolf simply called BS on buildings labelled ‘environmentally friendly’. Ultimately, one must come to terms with the fact that every type of building has environmental impacts and emits carbon, even a small tent. The primary goal of our practice is to reduce impacts through constraining programs, finding adaptive solutions, reducing building size and complexity, and maximizing thermal resilience and efficiency. This often has the added benefits of costing less and being easier to build!
When one considers;
- The significant impact of agriculture & development over existing habitat has contributed to the loss of 60% of all vertebrate creatures on Earth
- Construction and Building Energy use contributes the most significant proportion of GHG emissions globally, at roughly 40%
- Construction and demolition activities constitute almost 70% of total global waste and this is expected to double by 2025
- The crushing carbon footprint of cement
- The many building programs that could be satisfied by pre-existing buildings, or better uses of technology (home offices and/or telecommuting – think Zoom vs. Air Travel & Office Buildings)
- That most commercial buildings are largely unoccupied up to 70% or most of the time (after the 9-5 hours and weekends)
…the very question of whether a building should be built at all really should be asked by architects. While this might sound like a recipe for professional suicide, but this is the essential dilemma of the ecological architect, because most green alternatives that are crucial to halt and reverse the accelerated destruction the planet fall on a spectrum of ‘high to low environmental impact’ and few choices are innocuous. Doernach proposed several alternatives;
- Zero and low footprint development, afforestation (even in cities), permaculture and ‘layered’ agriculture
- ‘Living Buildings’ and Net-Zero buildings, made extensively of and with natural materials and plants
- Deep reductions in materials use, extensive repurposing, design for disassembly
- Re-useable and repairable, durable materials, constructed with self-made tools and buildings from locally available materials (Handbuch fuer Bessere Zeiten)
- Use of earthen materials, ie. stamped earth floors, adobes, and limiting use of concrete wherever possible
- Re-use and improvement of existing building stock to the greatest extent possible, combined with virtualization
- Home-based livelihoods and a return to a quasi-medieval sense of community farms and markets, well represented in present day rural German communities, where the automation of the workforce translates to a better quality of living, and more free-time available for activities focused on greener living and leisure; “Robot macht Freizeit”
- A good example of this is the Geodesic Dome at complete with Dr. John Todd’s living machines
We architects make our living now by picking the lesser of evils for our clients, when we could be asking how we might create the best possibility for current and future generations. Design thinking need not be restricted to building design but can apply to our entire economy. Ecotecture is about asking deeper questions, and only then, in the context of finding an optimal, admittedly least destructive solution, can the best practices outlined below find their proper place. Our portfolio represents a body of work that attempts to balance the greenest buildings possible, of the very highest quality, and for the least possible cost by using the least material possible, something Fuller referred to as Ephemeralization. With patience and experience, we have been rewarded with the opportunity to work on many buildings that are the best in class in each of these categories.
Ecotecture claims that one shouldn’t pay for the things that nature gives us in great abundance, namely energy, light and heat from the Sun, Air, Wind, and Water. Our projects strive to take optimal advantage of these energies and resources to reduce environmental footprint and lessen building operating costs. While there are many green building standards such as LEED, Passivhaus and many others that seek to define environmental performance in varying terms, my time in Germany and in Canada’s R2000 program taught me that it is possible to go much further than even these stringent environmental building standards, and that in fact, if we are to survive at all as a species, we ought to seriously consider ideas like Factor10 as a design strategy for almost everything – which states that a general per-capita reduction in materials and energy of 1/10th is in order to reduce developed nations’ impact on the planet and equalize the rapid growth of developing nations, such that we don’t require an untenable 10 additional planet Earths to sustain our current growth. Factor10 translated to a per-capita metric for the typical North American might look like the following;
Ecotecture when applied to buildings should strive to:
- A. Consume less than 100kWh/m2/yr (20kW less than the Passivhaus Standard) in terms of total energy aka. TEUI (most of our buildings have a TEUI under 50kWh/m2/yr)
- B. Emits less than ONE Metric Ton (MT) of CO2e (GHG) per Occupant annually aka. ‘Operational Emissions’ and…
- C. Conform to stringent material specifications for health (IAQ), sustainability and durability.
- D. Completely electrify buildings and entire city blocks and power with renewable energy supply (WWS)
- E. Have a ‘First Carbon’ impact or embodied carbon impact of less than 1MT per 1MT of construction material, or what we call an ‘Embodied Carbon Ratio’ of 1:1. The lower the better.
The following features should also be given consideration (each icon represents a specific environmental goal that was initially developed with the miniHOME project, but that has subsequently expanded, text descriptions are further down):
1. Spatial Optimization
2. Net Zero Energy
3. Natural Landscaping
4. Site Planning for View and Vistas
5. Solar Design
6. Thermal Mass
7. Passive Ventilation & Cooling
8. Natural Daylighting Strategies
9. High-Performance Building Envelope Design
10. Modular Design
11. Renewable Materials and Finishes
12. Reclaimed and Recycled Materials
13. Indoor Air Quality (IAQ)
14. Radiant Heating
15. Heat Recovery Ventilation
16. Solar Hot Water Systems
17. Solar Electric (Photovoltaic or PV systems)
18. Advanced Wastewater Treatment
19. Wastewater Heat Recovery
20. Composting Toilets
21. Rainwater Collection and Reuse
22. Load Reduction
23. Water Conserving
24. Green Roof Systems
25. Whole-House Automation
26. Advanced Media Systems
27. Wind Power
28. Geothermal and Heat Pumps
29. Fireplaces and Stoves
Below are links to some of the ‘Big Ideas’ we need to consider:
Resources on Materials:
- Concrete: https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2019/feb/25/concrete-the-most-destructive-material-on-earth
- Steel: https://medium.com/mit-technology-review/a-new-way-to-make-steel-could-cut-5-percent-of-co%E2%82%82-emissions-at-a-stroke-ecd0999a8515
- Glass:
- Foamglas:
- Wood: https://journal-buildingscities.org/articles/10.5334/bc.46/
- Rubber:
- Mineral Batt:
- Quick Embodied Calculator: https://www.thomsonarchitecture.ca/embodied-carbon-calculator/
Resources on Policy with SBEC/OAA Contributions:
- OAA Policy: https://www.oaa.on.ca/oaamedia/bloaags/text/2019_01_28_-_oaa_climate_submission.pdf
- AQI Ontario Air Quality Index (live data) http://www.airqualityontario.com/history/summary.php (CO2 is not yet listed as a pollutant)
- AQI Ontario Air Quality Index (live data – Barrie) http://www.airqualityontario.com/aqhi/today.php?sites=47045
Economics:
- https://harpers.org/archive/2008/06/our-phony-economy/
- https://www.kateraworth.com/doughnut/
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHe0bXAIuk0
- http://www.comer.org/content/SupremeCourtDecision_4May17.htm
Energy:
- Supergrid (1 mlnV vs. 500kV Transmission grids = 150GW, where 1gW=1 Nuke Plant or 10,000 Teslas): https://medium.com/mit-technology-review/chinas-giant-transmission-grid-could-be-the-key-to-cutting-climate-emissions-1f0ead2f2b71
- Supergrid: http://www.geni.org/globalenergy/library/technical-articles/transmission/environmental-expert.com/what-is-the-super-grid-supplying-renewable-electricity-worldwide/index.shtml
- The 100% Renewable Economy: http://energywatchgroup.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Full-Study-100-Renewable-Energy-Worldwide-Power-Sector.pdf
- https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/the-promise-of-100-in-2018#gs.2ucwe1
Carbon:
- Declare CO2 a pollutant: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffmcmahon/2012/12/27/epa-administrator-resigns-declared-carbon-dioxide-a-pollutant (2012)
- https://skepticalscience.com/co2-pollutant-advanced.htm
- The last quarter: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/611498/we-still-have-no-idea-how-to-eliminate-more-than-a-quarter-of-energy-emissions/
- https://medium.com/the-sensible-soapbox/british-columbias-carbon-tax-is-working-3ea81114be5a
- Key point: NONE OF THIS TECH GETS FUNDED WITHOUT A PRICE ON CARBON!
The Hydrogen Economy:
- https://www.newsweek.com/hydrogen-power-seawater-solar-1373678
Aviation Innovation:
- Boxwing Aircraft: https://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2012-04/jets-future
- Megafans: https://www.aiaa.org/uploadedFiles/About-AIAA/Press-Room/Key_Speeches-Reports-and-Presentations/2012/Martin-Lockheed-AVC-AIAA-GEPC2.pdf
- Boxwing-Nasa: https://www.nasa.gov/content/outside-the-box-sort-of
- https://www.nasa.gov/topics/aeronautics/features/greener_aircraft.html